Here's a bit more information that shows how there is (and was) little difference between the Neo-Con Democrats (left-leaning conservatives like Clinton) and the Republican party - basically, one and the same. If this doesn't indicate how different Sanders's platform was from the Democratic party's platform, why he had such a massive following (and was forced out of the race for it - as acknowledged by the Democratic party...who lost), how it was basically useless to vote for either one of the other parties' candidates and why Sanders would have won and is still doing what both of the others should still be doing - but are not - including the President, who was elected to do so...then I can't think of what would convince people.

Here's a bit more information that shows how there is (and was) little difference between the Neo-Con Democrats (left-leaning conservatives like Clinton) and the Republican party - basically, one and the same. If this doesn't indicate how different Sanders's platform was from the Democratic party's platform, why he had such a massive following (and was forced out of the race for it - as acknowledged by the Democratic party...who lost), how it was basically useless to vote for either one of the other parties' candidates and why Sanders would have won and is still doing what both of the others should still be doing - but are not - including the President, who was elected to do so...then I can't think of what would convince people. - Fundraisers who raised cash for Clinton's campaign are helping corporations lobby to overturn net neutrality, deregulate finance, and build prisons.