Saturday, June 30, 2018
I love to read about philosophy of all kinds and from all cultures. This is the very best way to learn to understand and come to terms with the changing world around us - the antithesis of which is to wind up like...well...Trump and his supporters. At any rate, here is some interesting information about 'la filosofía de lo mexicano' 🤟😊 :
Some rather interesting Chinese history:
Many societies suffer from the notion that women are less intelligent and capable than men. Even in more economically developed countries, where women have in the past two centuries won a variety of political and economic rights, prejudice agai...
Also known as: 'Why it doesn't pay to be overly conservative':
Some valuable perspective:
Turns out, it's a deep, philosophical question that stumps even the so-called experts! Food for your brain (it's ALWAYS healthy):
Holey Moley! It seems unimportant - right until the end. ;)
It seems indisputable that there are holes. For example, there are keyholes, black holes and sinkholes; and there are holes in things such as sieves, golf courses and doughnuts. We come into the world through holes, and when we die man...
Here's a pretty cool article for my friends who are culturally and musically inclined: 🎸 😎👍 🎶
Friday, June 29, 2018
SpaceX's Falcon 9 Rocket Launches Dragon to the International Space Station
Friday, June 22, 2018
Chaotic Clouds of Jupiter
Thursday, June 21, 2018
Launching to Observe Our Sun
Wednesday, June 20, 2018
Once in a Blue Dune
Tuesday, June 19, 2018
Rover Under the Milky Way - Atacama Rover Astrobiology Drilling Studies
Monday, June 18, 2018
Another Day at the Office
Sunday, June 17, 2018
For anyone interested in keeping track (and realize neither the media nor the 'President' is a reliable source), here is the official government record of the Special Counsel's Office:
"Taking pain seriously as a kind of social signal means truly throwing off the Cartesian thinking of old – looking at animals as more than little black boxes, responding to inputs into their biological circuitry." Sometimes, in my opinion, the philosophers get it wrong - and it has a detrimental effect on the human race, even when it is not really about the human race. "So why the resistance to seeing non-human suffering as a kind of communication? In part, it’s a hangover from René Descartes’s belief in the split between mind and body, within which animals were not accorded a mind." A great article, please read it! 😁👍
If you watch kids at a local playground, sooner or later one of them will run around and fall face-first to the ground. For a moment, there’s likely to be silence. Then the child will look around, catch a glimpse of their parent, and fina...
I was interested in this article, specifically, where Alisdair Macintyre wrote: "We all approach our circumstances as bearers of a particular social identity … I belong to this clan, that tribe, this nation … As such I inherit from the past of my family, my city, my tribe, my nation, a variety of debts … and obligations." However, when your view is a global one, your family/clan/tribe is that of all humans (and, ideally, all living things - including flora and fauna) and you consider nationalism to be just another form of bigotry (often applied by those seeking a benefit or advantage over others for their own self-interest which is surely not a very familial, clannish or tribal thing to do when the group you are doing these things against is your own) and an obstacle to global peace and good will for all members of your clan/tribe - one might begin to see those who subscribe to a more 'limited' perspective as terribly short-sighted or, perhaps, even narrow-minded. Besides, as many will attest, soldiers seem to spend a lot more time serving the interests of congressmen, leaders and others in the ruling class as an extension of force for the protection of their own assets, rather than the good of the people in general, despite that being the reason they were empowered. At least, this is what I find myself thinking on far too many occasions and, as a soldier, also often believed. I do my best to keep an open mind, so there are, of course, examples in history and even occurrences in the modern day where such force is warranted, though, it is most often for defensive - rather than offensive - purposes. I suspect that much more critical thinking should be involved before applying oneself to a situation in order to make sure that its nature is true. It is terribly easy to 'drink the Kool-Aid' without reading the label but, in many cases (such as JONESTOWN), reading the label is well advised. It may be valuable to read this article (cognitive bias aside).
Here's an interesting article... 🤔 (I might subtitle it 'How We Lost Our Ethics")
Max Weber’s famous text The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (1905) is surely one of the most misunderstood of all the canonical works regularly taught, mangled and revered in universities across the globe. This is not to ...